|
|
Second
Sight
The
seeing, in vision, of events before they occur. “Foresight”
expresses the meaning of second sight, which perhaps was originally
so called because normal vision was regarded as coming first,
while supernormal vision is a secondary thing, confined to certain
individuals.
In
the Scottish Highlands, and in Wales, the chief symbols beheld
are the shroud, and the corpse candle or other spectral illumination.
The Rev. Dr Stewart, of Nether Lochaber, recalls one of his parishioners,
a woman, called him to his door, and pointed out to him a rock
by the sea, which shone in a kind of phosphorescent brilliance.
The doctor attributed the phenomenon to decaying sea-weed, but
the woman said, “ No, a corpse will be laid there tomorrow.”
This, in fact, occurred; a dead body was brought in a boat for
burial, and was laid at the foot of the rock, where, as Dr Stewart
found, there was no decaying vegetable matter.
It
is, by some, believed that if a person tells what he has seen
before the event occurs he will lose the faculty, and recently
a second-sighted man, for this reason, did not warn his brother
against taking part in a regatta, though he had foreseen the accident
by which his brother was drowned. While this opinion prevails
it is, of course, impossible to prove that the vision ever occurred.
There are many seers, as Lord Tarbat wrote to Robert Boyle, to
whom the faculty is a trouble, “and they would be rid of
it at any rate, if they could.”
Perhaps
the visions most frequently reported are those of funerals, which
later occur in accordance with “the sight,” of corpses,
and of “arrivals” of persons, remote at the moment,
who later do arrive, with some distinctive mark of dress or equipment
which the seer could not normally expect, but observed in the
vision. Good examples in their own experience have been given
to the present writer by well-educated persons. Some of the anecdotes
are too surprising to be published without the names of the seers.
A
fair example of second sight is the following from the Scottish
Highlands. An aged man of the last generation was troubled by
visions of armed men in uniform, drilling in a particular field
near the sea. The uniform was not “England’s cruel
red,” and he foresaw an invasion. “It must be of Americans,”
he decided, “for the soldiers do not look like foreigners.”
The Volunteer movement later came into being, and the men drilled
on the ground where the seer had seen them.
Another
case was that of a man who happened to be sitting with a boy on
the edge of a path in the quarry. Suddenly he caught the boy and
leaped aside with him. He had seen a runaway trolly, with men
in it, dash down the path; but there were no traces of them below.
“The spirits of the living are powerful to-day,” said
the percipient in Gaelic, and next day the fatal accident occurred
at the spot. These are examples of what is, at present, alleged
in the matter of second sight.
“The
sight” may, or may not, be preceded or accompanied by epileptic
symptoms, but this appears now to be unusual. A learned minister
lately made a few inquiries on this point in his parish, at the
request of the present writer. His beadle had “the sight
“ in rich measure and it was always preceded by a sense
of discomfort and anxiety, but was not attended by convulsions.
Out of seven or eight seers in the parish, only one was not perfectly
healthy and temperate. A well-known seer, now dead, was weak of
body, the result of an accident, but seemed candid, and ready
to confess that his visions were occasionally failures. He said
that “the sight“ first came on him in the village
street when he was a boy. He saw a dead woman walk down the street
and enter the house that had been hers. He gave a few examples
of his foresight of events, and one of his failure to discover
the corpse of a man drowned in the loch.
The
phenomena, as described, may be classed under “clairvoyance,”
“ premonition,” and “telepathy“ , with
a residuum of symbolical visions. In these, “ corpse candles”
and spectral lights play a great part, but, in the region of the
Highlands, the “lights” are visible to all, even to
English tourists, and are not hallucinatory. The conduct of the
lights is brilliantly eccentric, but, as they have not been studied
by scientific specialists, their natural causes remain unascertained.
It
is plain that there is nothing peculiar to the Celts in second
sight; but the Gaelic words for it and the prevailing opinion
indicate telepathy, the action of “the spirits of the living”
as the main agents. That second sight has died out, under the
influence of education and newspapers, is a falsehood of popular
superstition in the south.
The
examples given, merely a selection from those known to the present
writer, prove that the faculty is believed to be as common as
in any previous age.
The
literature of second sight is not insignificant. The Secret Commonwealth
of the Rev. Mr Kirk (1691), edited by Sir Walter Scott in 1815
(a hundred copies), and by Andrew Lang in 1893, is in line with
cases given in Trials for Witchcraft ( Dalyell’s Darker
Superstitions of Scotland, and Wodrow’s Analecta). Aubrey
has several cases in his Miscellanies, and the correspondence
of Robert Boyle, Henry More, Glanvil and Pepys, shows an early
attempt at scientific examination of the alleged faculty. Martin’s
Description of the Western Isles (1703—1716), and the work
of the Rev. Mr Fraser, Dean of the Isles (1707, 1820) describe
second sight. Fraser was familiar with the contemporary scientific
theories of hallucination, and justly remarked that “ the
sight” was not peculiar to the Highlanders; but that, in
the south, people dared not confess their experiences, for fear
of ridicule.
|
|