|
|
Burns and Scott
The
meeting of the boy, "Walter Scott, with the established poet,
Robert Burns, was one of the great moments of literary history.
This is Scott's classic story of the encounter.
I
saw him one day at the late venerable Professor Ferguson's, where
there were several gentlemen of literary reputation, among whom
I remember the celebrated Mr. Dugald Stewart. Of course, we youngsters
sat silent, looked and listened. The only thing I remember which
was remarkable in Burns's manner, was the effect produced upon
him by a print of Bunbury's, representing a soldier lying dead
on the snow, his dog sitting in misery on one side, on the other,
his widow, with a child in her arms. These lines were written
beneath:
"Cold
on Canadian hills, or Minden's plain,
Perhaps that mother wept her soldier slain
Bent o'er her babe, her eye dissolved in dew,
The big drops mingling with the milk the drew
Gave the sad presage of his future years,
The child of misery baptised in tears."
Burns
seemed much affected by the print, or rather by the ideas which
it suggested to his mind. He actually shed tears. He asked whose
the lines were ; and it chanced that nobody but myself remembered
that they occur in a half-forgotten poem of Langhorne's called
by the unpromising title of " The Justice of Peace." I whispered
my information to a friend present; he mentioned it to Burns,
who rewarded me a look and a word, which, though of mere civility,
I then received and still recollect with very great pleasure.
His
person was Strong and robust; his manners rustic, not clownish
; a sort of dignified plainness and simplicity, which received
part of its effect perhaps from one's knowledge of his extraordinary
talents. His features are represented in Mr. Nasmyth's picture
: but to me it conveys the idea that they are diminished, as if
seen in perspective. I think his countenance was more massive
than it looks in any of the portraits. I should have taken the
poet, had I not known what he was, for a very sagacious country
farmer of the old Scottish school, i,e., none of your modern agriculturists
who keep labourers for their drudgery, but the douce gudeman who
held his own plough.
There
was a strong expression of sense and shrewdness in all his lineaments
; the eye alone, I think, indicated the poetical character and
temperament. It was large, and of a dark cast, which glowed (I
say literally glowed) when he spoke with feeling or interest.
I never saw such another eye in a human head, though I have seen
the most distinguished men of my time. His conversation expressed
perfect self-confidence, without the slightest presumption. Among
the men who were the most learned of their time and country, he
expressed himself with perfect firmness, but without the least
intrusive forwardness ; and when he differed in opinion, he did
not hesitate to express it firmly, yet at the same time with modesty.
I
have only to add, that his dress corresponded with his manner.
He was like a farmer dressed in his best to dine with the laird.
I do not speak in malam partem, when I say, I never saw a man
in company with his superiors in station or information more perfectly
free from either the reality or the affectation of embarrassment.
Sir
Walter Scott.
|
|